The reading are sometimes 20 points too high. Worse is it is inconsistent. Sometimes it would read 5 points high and sometimes 28. Testing supplies are too expensive. I can almost pay for the lancets and strips for my other meter myself when compared to the lancets and the co-pay for these.

No matter how careful I am, I end up using two and three strips EVERY time I take a reading. Error message pops up. Then it is really difficult to get another strip when my finger is bleeding. My insurance MAKES me use this product or I would NEVER buy again.

Without doubt the worst meter I have ever tried. Despite persisting with it for over 3 months, I finally gave it up as a joke. A very bad one. At its worst anything up to 25 strips were needed for a "valid" result. Errors 2, 4 and 5 were so common that to get a result first go was a matter for surprise. I doubt the accuracy of the results given that tests taken at similar times with other meters would show results at a large variance to this meter. The only suggestion given by the manufacturer was " you must be using it incorrectly". Given that meters of a similar design have not given me anywhere near the problems this one did, I doubt that to be the case.
Nil
Terrible error rate, inaccurate results

Got this meter when participating in a research study. Had severe hypos which were not detected by the OneTouch, and read it as 6.5, however when checking (with the same blood) on my normal meter, the result was 2.5. After I noticed this discrepancy, I kept an eye on the levels of both meters. When having hypos, the OneTouch did not detect accurately, and varied between being too low and too high compared with my other meter.
No coding
Strips are very sensitive when applying blood- I had alot of strips not working after applying blood.