??!

Reviews

4.5

96 reviews
5
(66)
4
(18)
3
(6)
2
(4)
1
(2)
  • Build Quality
    5.0 (4)
  • Value for Money
    4.8 (4)
  • Noise Level
    5.0 (4)
  • Wet Weather Handling
    5.0 (4)
  • Durability
    5.0 (4)
  • Dry Weather Handling
    5.0 (4)
Previous
Next
Baden

Badenlismore

  • 2 reviews
  • 2 likes

great tyre so far

published

bought these to replace bridgestones on my mazda 3, after being told they were worth the extra money. Well that seems true enough. 195/65/15 for $133 each incl balanceis not too pricey + a $50 eftpos card from Jax. great in wet, much quieter than bridgestone B250 or supercats, maybe even a bit more economy (from 7.4 l/100 to 7.2 l ). No complaints so far
Now done 45000km, perhaps another 15000 left. Still quiet, and good in wet and quiet. No complaints

CarSkoda fabia
John Suen

John Suenmelbourne

  • 7 reviews
  • 11 likes

Pretty good

published

I have recently upgraded my tyres to xm2.
I can feel the excellent control and grip over dry and wet compare to my old cheap budget tyre. My old tyres has no wet grip at all and that's why I needed to get better ones. I was expecting better fuel consumption but no noticeable change on that. Overall, I think they are pretty good.

TonyBrown

TonyBrown

  • 9 reviews
  • 4 likes

Ticks all the boxes

published

These tyres are so much better than the Bridgestone RE92s that came with my V6 Camry I'm sticking with them even though they are 25% more expensive than Conti's 4 for price of 3 offer. Got 60,000 out of them and not down to the check mark yet. Only compared to 50K for the RE92s. Much better handling AND FAR SUPERIOR in the wet. My car has racked up 300 K's without missing a beat in all conditions including highway, gravel, off road through paddocks, cane fields, creeks etc and I swear by these tyres.

1 comment
TonyBrown
TonyBrown
Passenger Tyres

Find out how Michelin Energy XM2 compares to other Passenger Tyres

Know better, choose better.



Compare all
Chris, Brisbane.

Chris, Brisbane.Brisbane

  • 6 reviews

quieter than Pirelli P1

published

I had a set of Michelin XM2's on my Toyota Aurion Prodigy and replaced them with a set of Pirelli P1's. I'm not sure of the mileage on the Michelin's because they were on the car which I bought second hand. I've travelled 15000k on thePirelli's and I'm fairly happy but the Michelin's were definitely a more comfortable tire. In all other respects I find them similar but for ride alone I will purchase Michelin's next time. The ride really is so much more comfortable.

Steve

SteveNSW, 2022

  • 29 reviews
  • 5 likes

Good wearing tyre and a good all-round tyre

published
RobbieB

RobbieBSydney

Noisy and increased fuel consumption - don't believe the hype

published

These tyres are by far the most noisy I have ever owned. My fuel consumption in the first 10,000kms has gone up 1.5 litres per 100 (was 8.2 - now 9.7) with pretty much same driving patterns. Even turning at a roundabout at normal speed, you can hear the tyres screeching!

Noisy, increased fuel consumption

Cahill

CahillCANBERRA

  • 4 reviews

Love these tyres

published

Fitted a set on my Avalon (size 205x65/15) in December 2012, replacing Falken ZE-912s. Done just over 16,000 km and they've been excellent! They are quiet on coarse-chip roads and handle very well in the wet and dry. Best of all, they're not too soft and show minimal wear. A big improvement over the Falkens that wore out in about 23,000 km of comparable driving!
Quiet, good price, durable. Great cruising tyre.

1 comment
Cahill
Cahill
Citizen

CitizenGreater Melbourne (Inner), VIC

  • 2 reviews
  • 4 likes

Stopped in the wet

published
1 comment
Fred
Fred

Why were you travelling so close in the wet?

Brizmum

BrizmumBrisbane

Huge improvment on supercats

published

These tyres replaced 215/60R16 Supercats on a 2008 Toyota Camry. Improved handling and no more wheel spin on take offs especially in the rain. .Quiet as well on the motorway. Have travelled around 2,000 kms so far and happy with the XM2's although have not found greatly improved fuel economy.
Handling and safety.
No great improvement to vehicle fuel economy

Passenger Tyres

Find out how Michelin Energy XM2 compares to other Passenger Tyres

Know better, choose better.

Compare all
anonymous32

anonymous32Sydney, NSW

  • 32 reviews

VERY MUCH SATISFIED

published

QUIET AND SOFT WITH 36psi, WHAT ELSE DO U WANT.
Using it on my Toyota Aurion in 215/60/R16
Not tested yet in wet conditions how ever over all road grip is much better as compared to my previous tyres, Recommend to always change all 4 tyres rather than 2 in pairs.
QUIET SOFT, VALUE FOR MONEY, AFTER ALL ITS MICHELIN
NOTHING

John Roberts

John RobertsChicago

  • 6 reviews
  • 4 likes

Don't believe the 'Energy' hype any more

published
shenanigans32

shenanigans32Sunshine Coast

  • 9 reviews
  • 2 likes

Great grip!

published
shane mooney

shane mooneySydney

  • 10 reviews

XM2 not good as XM1 in Wet

published

I had a set of Michelin Energy XM1s in my commodore for last 60,000km and they were fantastic in wet and dry. Given XM1s are no longer made i thought i give XM2s a try. However after driving 2000km on XM2 they are not good as XM1s in wet. Guaranteed wheel spin at traffic lights in wet/ or going up a hill. Only good thing about XM2 is they are less noisy on the road than XM1s for sure.
Less noise
not so good in wet

edsview

edsviewAU

  • 2 reviews
  • 1 like

Couldn't be happier

published
McDoog

McDoogGold Coast

  • 2 reviews
  • 2 likes

Different class

published

I replaced a set of Pirelli's with the Michelin Energy XM2 and noticed the difference immediately. It's very noticeable how much smoother the ride is and the handling is fantastic. There is also a big drop in tyre noise. Don't get me wrong, the Pirelli's were pretty good tyres, but these are just so much better all round. My fuel consumption has been better and the tread seems to be wearing pretty well, so this is shaping up to be money very well spent. Definitely worth the extra few dollars.
Smooth ride, quiet and responsive handling

Passenger Tyres

Find out how Michelin Energy XM2 compares to other Passenger Tyres

Know better, choose better.

Compare all

Effortlessly Glides on the road and excellent braking distance

published
1 comment
URANUS
URANUS
Page 5 of 5
See all Michelin Energy XM2 reviews

Questions & Answers

Rathinavelu R.

Rathinavelu R.asked

whats The difference between Michelin energy xm2 and Michelin primacy 4 ??

No answers
Naeem A.

Naeem A.asked

dothey offer an enjoyable ride as compared with yokohama ES32?

No answers
Ashok N

Ashok Nasked

Is this tyre is directional?

2 answers
aussie-rider
aussie-rider

No, they aren't. Which means they're easily rotated.

Steve
Steve

They are Directional tyres, their construction have a tread designed to rotate in only one direction and can't be mounted in any other way. They are also called "unidirectional" tyres. Directional tyres will have an arrow with the word "rotation" on the sidewall (which these have) showing the proper rotation direction. The function of directional tyres is that they have lateral grooves in the tread that form a V-shaped tread pattern. The tread design is intended to channel water from the center of the tyre outward as the tyre rotates. That is about what directional tyres are and they can be rotated!

Get an answer from our members

ieatwords.com.au has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence our content moderation policies in any way, though ieatwords.com.au may earn commissions for products/services purchased via affiliate links.